Tuesday, September 16, 2025

The Marketplace of Ideas

The marketplace of ideas is a metaphor to promote freedom of expression, implying that the truth and best ideas will come out. There can be a “competition” between the different view points, such as a debate to allow people to express themselves and opinions. But what happens when political violence is undermining trust?

A key example of the Marketplace of Ideas is Turning Point USA, founded by Charlie Kirk and Bill Montgomery in 2012. Turning Point USA is an American nonprofit organization that advocates for conservative politics on high school, college, and university campuses. His conservative convictions are centered on faith, family, the sanctity of marriage, pro-life values, patriotism, justice, and individual freedom. While he is not for the democratic viewpoints, he is happy to hear other viewpoints. He allows citizens to come up and have a friendly debate in an attempt to change his mind and prove a point.

One of the most recent examples of trying to restrict the Marketplace of Ideas is the assassination of Charlie Kirk, at the Utah Valley University on September 10th 2025. Imagine having to hate someone's opinion so much that you feel the need to pull the trigger. If a viewpoint was truly correct, morally and factually, you won't need a gun that argument would survive the debate. No amount of gun laws can even fix this, if there's a will then there's a way. Although, when your reality is so twisted and warped violence will be the only way you can win.

Charlie was shot from a rooftop while debating a student on gun laws. How ironic. He was a loving husband, father of two, man of God, as well as president of Turning Point USA. He in no way deserved what happened to him, as should nobody.

The response to this tragedy has resulted in unity. A unity so strong there might just be changed norms for speech, for how we debate, and for how we see one another.

How has expressing your views in a friendly demeanor somehow turned into something someone should be killed for, and what's even worse is that some people are happy and celebrating this extremely shifting event.

As an American citizen all I can hope for is that the marketplace of ideas did not perish with Charlie kirk. There are so many countries where you are killed for your beliefs. America was not supposed to be one of them. Nor were any of the others, may god be with these countries. You may have silenced one voice but you woke a whole generation and we will not stay silent. As Charlie Kirk said it best “free speech is the last best hope we have in western society”

Tuesday, September 9, 2025

What does the Bible have to say about slavery?

The question of whether the Bible condones or condemns slavery is complex, rooted in historical context, theological interpretation, and evolving moral frameworks. While slavery is undeniably present in biblical texts, its portrayal is far from monolithic. A careful reading reveals both regulatory acceptance and moral resistance, suggesting that the Bible reflects a tension between cultural norms and divine principles of justice and human dignity.

Biblical Passages: Regulation vs. Moral Vision

Slavery appears throughout both the Old and New Testaments, often in ways that seem to normalize or regulate the institution. In the Old Testament, the Mosaic Law includes detailed instructions on the treatment of slaves. For example, Leviticus 25:44–46 permits Israelites to enslave foreigners, and Exodus 21:2–6 outlines conditions under which fellow Israelites could sell themselves into servitude to repay debts. These laws were not merely descriptive—they were presented as divine commandments, embedding slavery within the religious and legal framework of
ancient Israel.

The New Testament continues this pattern, treating slavery as a legitimate social institution. Passages such as 1 Peter 2:18–20 instruct slaves to submit to their masters, even those who are unjust. The epistle of Philemon, a personal letter from Paul to a Christian slave owner, does not challenge the legitimacy of slavery but instead appeals for kindness within the existing framework. Other verses, such as Exodus 21:20–21, permit the beating of slaves under certain conditions, while Leviticus 19:20–22 offers lenient consequences for sexual exploitation of female slaves. These texts have historically been used to justify slavery, particularly during the American Civil War, when pro-slavery advocates cited scripture to defend their practices.

Yet, alongside these regulatory passages, the Bible also contains verses that affirm human dignity and spiritual equality. Exodus 21:16 unequivocally condemns the theft and sale of human beings: “Whoever steals a man and sells him… shall be put to death.” This reflects a deeper biblical principle—that human life is sacred and exploitation is morally abhorrent. The New Testament builds on this foundation, emphasizing spiritual equality in Galatians 3:28: “There is neither slave nor free… for you are all one in Christ Jesus.” These verses suggest that while slavery was a social reality, it was not the moral ideal.

Comparative Religious Perspectives

Slavery is not unique to Christianity; it appears in the historical frameworks of many world religions. Judaism regulated slavery with protections and manumission laws, often requiring the release of slaves after a set period. Islam permitted slavery but encouraged the freeing of slaves as a virtuous act, linking emancipation to spiritual reward. Hinduism associated servitude with karma and caste, while Buddhism discouraged slave trading and emphasized compassion. Confucianism tolerated slavery but also inspired reforms in East Asia.

Importantly, religious movements have also played a pivotal role in abolition. Evangelical Christians were at the forefront of anti-slavery campaigns in the 18th and 19th centuries, interpreting scripture through a lens of justice and liberation. Buddhist ethics influenced reforms in Southeast Asia, and Islamic scholars have increasingly emphasized the moral imperative to abolish slavery. Over time, most major religions have shifted toward condemning slavery, aligning their teachings with principles of freedom, justice, and human worth.


Conclusion: Divine Endorsement or Cultural Reflection?

The presence of slavery in religious texts, including the Bible, reflects the cultural and economic realities of ancient societies rather than a divine endorsement of human bondage. While certain passages regulate and even normalize slavery, others point toward a higher moral vision—one rooted in compassion, liberation, and dignity. The Bible’s overarching narrative, especially as interpreted through the lens of modern theology, leans toward the affirmation of human worth and the rejection of exploitation.

Thus, while slavery existed within the biblical worldview, it was never the heart of divine teaching. The enduring message of scripture is not one of domination, but of redemption—calling believers to uphold justice, protect the vulnerable, and recognize the inherent value of every human life.

AI Disclosure: After taking notes on some Bible text regarding slavery, I used Claude to smooth the text and format it in a readable way. I then edited the AI generated text. I added photos .

Thursday, September 4, 2025

Supreme Court Reflection

The Supreme Court of the United States 

Before I started learning about the Supreme Court, I didn’t think much about it. It felt distant; like something that only mattered to lawyers, judges, or people involved in big national cases. But the more I’ve explored how it works, the more I’ve realized how connected it is to everyday life and how powerful it really is.

One of the first things that surprised me was the number of petitions the Court receives around 7,000 every year. That’s thousands of people reaching out, hoping their case will be heard. And even though only about 100 are accepted, every single one gets looked at. It doesn’t matter if it’s a handwritten letter from someone in prison or a formal legal document from a top attorney, they all get the same level of attention. That really stuck with me. It shows that the Court is serious about fairness and doesn’t play favorites.

U.S. Supreme Court
What I’ve come to appreciate is how the Supreme Court isn’t just a legal institution—it’s a symbol of trust. It doesn’t have the flashy power of Congress or the visibility of the presidency, but it holds something just as important: the confidence of the American people. That trust is what gives it strength.

Learning about the Court has made me think differently about justice. It’s not always fast, and it’s definitely not simple, but it’s built on the idea that everyone deserves to be heard. That’s powerful. And even though I’m not a lawyer or judge, understanding how the Supreme Court works has helped me see how deeply it affects all of us.

As I learned from this documentary about the Supreme Court 

AI Disclosure: After taking notes while watching the Supreme Court video, I used Microsoft Copilot to smooth the text and format it in a readable way. I then edited the AI generated text. I added photos and captions. I expanded on what the AI-generated text by adding some of my personal thoughts and opinions


Beyond the Lecture Hall: How Movies, Documentaries, and Mock Trials Changed My Understanding of our class

When I first saw the syllabus for this class, I'll be honest I was a little skeptical about the non-traditional teaching methods. It see...